Practical Robot

P-40 Fighter Bomber

Plasma Bomber added 3 years ago

Fun build for the Warplanes Squad.

Working build used for low tiers. Can switch between smg and plasmas depending on what you prefer.

Favorites 0
Robot Statistics
Views
1 726
Comments
18
Ratings
46
Practical Rating
9.5
Creative Rating
9.7
Last Updated
3 years ago
View Ratings

Robot Ratings

Function rating by BreaumTheBroom10.0
Function rating by Wibblebury9.5
Function rating by Porkfloss_210.0
Function rating by 5tuka7.5
Function rating by TraceInSpace9.5
Function rating by Reachfordastarz9.5
Function rating by Vagabond10.0
Function rating by Frog10.0
Function rating by BabyInTheHouse9.5
Function rating by Lion10.0
Function rating by YouTube_efim609.0
Creative rating by BreaumTheBroom10.0
Creative rating by Wibblebury9.5
Creative rating by Porkfloss_210.0
Creative rating by 5tuka7.5
Creative rating by TraceInSpace9.5
Creative rating by Reachfordastarz9.5
Creative rating by Vagabond10.0
Creative rating by Frog10.0
Creative rating by BabyInTheHouse9.5
Creative rating by Lion10.0
Creative rating by YouTube_efim609.0
Function rating by TheSilverChair7.5
Creative rating by TheSilverChair9.5
Function rating by Grodbert6.0
Creative rating by Grodbert9.0
Function rating by cjt150010.0
Creative rating by cjt150010.0
Creative rating by BlackGentleman10.0
Function rating by BlackGentleman10.0
Creative rating by mestmaker10.0
Function rating by mestmaker10.0
Function rating by _Hatsune_Miku9.0
Creative rating by _Hatsune_Miku9.0
Function rating by Manjuel9.5
Creative rating by Manjuel9.5
Creative rating by Juvar239.5
Function rating by Juvar239.0
Creative rating by MegaBB10.0
Function rating by MegaBB9.5
Creative rating by piippiz10.0
Function rating by piippiz6.0
Creative rating by VladimirEterna10.0
Function rating by VladimirEterna7.0
Function rating by necr0tix10.0
Creative rating by necr0tix10.0
Comments and Ratings
necr0tix
2 years ago
(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °)

Ratings 10.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
cjt1500
3 years ago
the post says its T4, but the pics say its T5, im confused, is it T4 or is it T5 :P

Ratings 10.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
M JSU
3 years ago
The cubes were estimated. That might explain it. :P
This message was deleted at 30 Dec 2014
M JSU
3 years ago
I don't speak Russian sorry. Please stick to English using a translator. :)
BabyInTheHouse
3 years ago
Ah I understand had the same problem with the Hurricane, it was manouvrable but not very fast :/

Ratings 9.5 practical and 9.5 creative0
M JSU
3 years ago
Haha. That's why my builds are perfect replicas. There's additions to it that makes it no longer replicas but modified versions of what they are. haha.
BabyInTheHouse
3 years ago
You replied to my topic (of the Belgian Hurricane), and yes they look a bit a like... But maybe put the thrusters inside the plane (like I did) could improve te looks, and I can see it's designed on a P-39 because of the thrusters on the tail and the shape of the cockpit... It looks good maybe just put the thrusters in the plane and I would've given it a 10/10.

Ratings 9.5 practical and 9.5 creative0
M JSU
3 years ago
I would if I could. There's thrusters inside the same area as the other front thrusters (the rear ones were for extra speed). So if I put them inside, it'd lose the other ones.
BabyInTheHouse
3 years ago
But if you remove the blocks where the thrusters are on, then put the thrusters there you can actually put them in the plane

Ratings 9.5 practical and 9.5 creative0
M JSU
3 years ago
I can't actually. The thrusters insides are attached to them as well. It was to enabled faster up and down movements. :)
5tuka
3 years ago
Nice aircraft but harly looking like a P-40. There are some inaccurecies like the lenghtened canopy at the back and the nose lacking the iconic air inlet, the raadar dish looks strange as well (I preferrably mount them below horizontally making them look like a tail wheel).

No rudder? Can it fly properly without one?

Anyway keep it up.

Ratings 7.5 practical and 7.5 creative0
M JSU
3 years ago
I actually went off a p-39 model which was sclose to it. And the details are pretty limited for t4 unfortunately. I added additional things to it so it's not a full replica of the p-40 XD

And yes. it flies perfect....

...till it gets shot heavily. :P
Porkfloss_2
3 years ago
Nice job! Why not make it an interceptor instead? :D

Ratings 10.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
M JSU
3 years ago
Yeah. I wrote it can change between plasma and smg. :D
BreaumTheBroom
3 years ago
Huhuhuhuuu! :D Fantastic Jay! :D
How come you post it under functionality instead of creativity? :)

Ratings 10.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
M JSU
3 years ago
No point making something I can't use in battle. Who would see it then? D:
BreaumTheBroom
3 years ago
oooooh true, I do the same xD

Ratings 10.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
M JSU
3 years ago
Cause it functions well. It's a half creative and have functional. You know I like to make my designs battle ready.

Constructive Points

Constructive points are what you get when other users mark your reviews (comment+ratings) as constructive.

When should you mark a review as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely mark it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do I want these points?

After receiving X amount of points you will get a chance of being promoted to "trusted reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Trusted reviewer?

As a trusted reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Trusted reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Constructive Voting

Hey, seems like you're about to place your first constructive vote. That's awesome! I just wanted to inform you a bit about it before you jump into voting though. You can vote on any comment accompanied with a rating as a "Constructive Review". This will give the reviewer a "Constructive Point".

When should I vote a comment as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely vote it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do one want these points?

After receiving about 100 total amount of votes the user will get a chance of being promoted to "Approved Reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Approved Reviewer?

As an approved reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Approved reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Ok, got it! I want to place my vote now.
  • 8 items
1 page