Practical Robot

M32 "Savage" Close Air Support

Plasma Copter added 2 years ago

Copter time again!


Here we go with part 2 of the M3x series release week.



Schedule for this week
Mo - M31 "Prowler" Stealth Copter (Showcase)
Tue - M32 "Savage" Close Air Support (Showcase)
Wed - M33 (some experimental fun with Mk10.1x) (Showcase)
Thu - M34 "Typhoon" Heavy Artillery (you're right, it'll be a beefed up Monsoon!) (Showcase)
Fr - combined M3x series build tutorial for the "Prowler" and "Typhoon" versions




The M32 "Savage" Close Air Support

Basically this little thing was created when I asked a simple question: "What do we get, if we don't wanna sneak around, but instead want to stay really close to the pack and use a position right above the horde for devastating splash attacks?"

Removing the reconnaisance equipment from a "Prowler" and spending every spare point of CPU on TX-1 cubes and EPs enables this beast to either facetank a good share of damage (see Additional gameplay footage #1), or evade it using the almost absurd agility the TX-1 related weight reduction gives, even more so if you add a little extra thrust. Best thing: It's moving pretty well with only one rotor - though it turns a lot you can get back to medics - and still movable at all when there are just thrusters left after a heavy beating (see Additional gameplay footage #2).

I normally prefer to use Carbo-Cyan over this triple color scheme shown on the screenshots, but for the sake of visibility and to show the commonalities with the "Prowler" version I just leave it at that for now ;).


Playstyle: Hover close to the front line in TDM, in range of your medic(s), and lay waste to Reds lines. Focus groups and medics, and be ready to counter flanking maneuvers if the need be. Or partly take over Megas role as damage sponge, as shown in the embedded video.
(Once more shouts out to all that were with and against me in this truly memorable match! =))


Configuration

TX-1 hardened chassis (front and central spine)
4x Mk10 rotors in vertical 1-2-1 configuration (partly TX-1 hardened)
9x Mk10 Plasma
11x Mk8 Thrusters (3x forward, 4x backward, 2x downward, 2x upward)
5x Mk2 Thrusters (2x upwards, 2x downwards (all at the front), 1x ejector seat)
3x Mk10.1 Electroplates on rotors

Especially the EPs, that seem to be placed very odd at first, have a large impact on the lifespan of the rotors. Though they are not taking the initial damage by being hit as the first part they still can absorb a lot of damage that normally would spread to the tetra weaved beams the rotors are mounted on. in the end most times I only loose the rotors and EPs, which will be back in seconds when healed.

This part of the experiment was inspired by Baerentoeters research he presents on his Youtube channel, most notably the impressive "Robocraft technical : Multiconnecting cubes + Mk10.1 fun". But we will se more of that the next days ;) .



Attention: The videos I linked consist of footage recorded in matches with early prototypes, so once more expect to see differences in configuration (no EPs, different rotor mounts etc) aswell as naming ;) . Still sorting out the beef my PC and the editing software have with each other =/


Additional gameplay footage
#1: "Who needs rotors anyways?"
(No rotors? No Problems - in case you've got some thrusters left ;))
#2: Battle Arena gameplay footage



Conclusion

For those around that like a brawl instead of playing hide and seek the "Savage" will proof to be a solid copter well worth the extra expenses for TX-1 cubes, as the gameplay footage illustrates. Started as a simple test these qualities made it a permamnent addition to my collection of bots. It will stay there for a long time I suppose =)

If you like to see more drop by tomorrow, when we explore the "EPs as damage sinks" idea in more detail.

Favorites 1
Robot Statistics
Views
989
Comments
11
Ratings
10
Practical Rating
9.8
Creative Rating
9.7
Last Updated
Never
View Ratings

Robot Ratings

Function rating by AugustusV10.0
Creative rating by AugustusV10.0
Function rating by Husky7778.5
Creative rating by Husky7779.0
Function rating by Otheisis10.0
Creative rating by Otheisis10.0
Function rating by swaggypanda2259.0
Creative rating by swaggypanda2259.0
Function rating by W4RM3CH4N1C10.0
Creative rating by W4RM3CH4N1C10.0
Share this Robot
Direct link to this robot
Embed robot info on your website
Comments and Ratings
W4RM3CH4N1C
2 years ago
Just as awesome as all the other fine vehicle you have on display for us to drool over hehe

Ratings 10.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
DerSpini
2 years ago
xD No need to just stop at that, go ahead and build your own ;)
W4RM3CH4N1C
2 years ago
Heheh if only I followed tutorials :)

Ratings 10.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
swaggypanda225
2 years ago
great job

Ratings 9.0 practical and 9.0 creative0
DerSpini
2 years ago
Tyvm =)
Otheisis
2 years ago
Cool :D I often see you with good and practical helicopters bots in game

Ratings 10.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
DerSpini
2 years ago
Hey, a name I remember (I'm bad at that usually)! We run into each other quite often recently :D

Thanks for rating, cheers! =)
Husky777
2 years ago
Badass chopper, GJ

Ratings 8.5 practical and 9.0 creative0
DerSpini
2 years ago
Yes, indeed. It has repeatedly proven to be one in games of the kind as the embedded video shows^^.

Thanks for the rating :)
AugustusV
2 years ago
Excellent work as always man, consider yourself favorited :)

Ratings 10.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
DerSpini
2 years ago
Thanks a lot, I'm feeling flattered :D

Constructive Points

Constructive points are what you get when other users mark your reviews (comment+ratings) as constructive.

When should you mark a review as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely mark it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do I want these points?

After receiving X amount of points you will get a chance of being promoted to "trusted reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Trusted reviewer?

As a trusted reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Trusted reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Constructive Voting

Hey, seems like you're about to place your first constructive vote. That's awesome! I just wanted to inform you a bit about it before you jump into voting though. You can vote on any comment accompanied with a rating as a "Constructive Review". This will give the reviewer a "Constructive Point".

When should I vote a comment as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely vote it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do one want these points?

After receiving about 100 total amount of votes the user will get a chance of being promoted to "Approved Reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Approved Reviewer?

As an approved reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Approved reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Ok, got it! I want to place my vote now.
  • 5 items
1 page