Creative Robot

~{NEO TECH}~ Car-sled MkIII "BULLWARG"

Plasma Sled added 1 year ago

Swiftness was too slow...
MrSharp was too messy...


BEHOLD...THE...
▒█▀▀█ ▒█░▒█ ▒█░░░ ▒█░░░ ▒█░░▒█ ░█▀▀█ ▒█▀▀█ ▒█▀▀█
▒█▀▀▄ ▒█░▒█ ▒█░░░ ▒█░░░ ▒█▒█▒█ ▒█▄▄█ ▒█▄▄▀ ▒█░▄▄
▒█▄▄█ ░▀▄▄▀ ▒█▄▄█ ▒█▄▄█ ▒█▄▀▄█ ▒█░▒█ ▒█░▒█ ▒█▄▄█

Also known as "Car-sled MkIII", but bullwarg sounds way more badarse...

What's new in this mark huh?
First, let's recap for those don't check on previous marks (aka, bad people who won't get cookies on their birthday).
My Car-Sled series bots all feature these awesome Pros and awesome Cons (wait what...)
-> Cruiser-Friendly controls
-> Sled speed
-> No drifting
-> No airborne possibility (although it seems ebbit made one fly)
-> Better not lose the rudders

Like I said, the first one was too slow when turning, it was fixed by adding a keel on the belly with the second mark, but at the cost of a messy design and awkward shape.
The BULLWARG features all that stuff, BUT, with more powerful guns, and a much smoother design!
AND IT ALSO HAS A POWER BOOSTER YES YES!
It's deep inside the thing though, pretty hard to see.

AND NICE GODDAMN COLOURS. YES. PROPER NORMAL HUMAN COLOURS. MUAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA NYAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
I AM SOOOOO POWEEERFFFUUUULLLLLL!!!!!!!!...!!...


BUT BE WARNED! The series are not over! For I have on last problem to solve!
Triforcing.
All my Car-Sleds have a core for armour and movement, but guns are not connected on a separate core!

And that will be fixed on the?? on the??? ON THE???????
Mark IV!!!

PS: html codes for the win!

Favorites 1
Robot Statistics
Views
651
Comments
22
Ratings
19
Practical Rating
9.1
Creative Rating
9.8
Last Updated
Never
View Ratings

Robot Ratings

Function rating by El3veN10.0
Creative rating by El3veN10.0
Function rating by Comm98610.0
Creative rating by Comm98610.0
Function rating by piippiz8.5
Creative rating by piippiz8.0
Function rating by Shafty4209.0
Creative rating by Shafty42010.0
Creative rating by Vespertine3210.0
Function rating by urobo79.5
Creative rating by urobo710.0
Function rating by Vespertine328.5
Creative rating by Wymsageu10.0
Function rating by Zalera9.0
Creative rating by Zalera9.5
Function rating by JellyNinja6.5
Creative rating by JellyNinja8.5
Function rating by Sidil9.0
Creative rating by Sidil9.5
Share this Robot
Direct link to this robot
Embed robot info on your website
Comments and Ratings
Sidil
1 year ago
I love this style, very close to mine.
Le soucis sur ton robot c'est qu'il est trop à découvert, il manque de choix lorsqu'un danger immédiat se présente. o/' O '\o

Ratings 9.0 practical and 9.5 creative0
JellyNinja
1 year ago
All I can see is the shell and two guns. so i dont know..................................

Ratings 6.5 practical and 8.5 creative0
Zalera
1 year ago

Ratings 9.0 practical and 9.5 creative0
Wymsageu
1 year ago
dem carbon 6 thrusters doe

Ratings 10.0 creative0
Vespertine32
1 year ago
I cant rate practicality because i see no weapons but creativity wise, it looks good. Good use of cosmetic.

Ratings 10.0 creative and 8.5 practical0
learno
1 year ago
Picture number 7.
Vespertine32
1 year ago
Oh nvm. 8.5 practicality.

Ratings 10.0 creative and 8.5 practical0
urobo7
1 year ago
scroll all the pictures XD

Ratings 9.5 practical and 10.0 creative0
Shafty420
1 year ago
wowow. How do these work? Sorry, i didnt read the description yet

Ratings 9.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
learno
1 year ago
Well it moves just like a cruiser. (only it can't go backwards, coz I didn't add any backwards thrusters)
But with sled speed. (227 mph at OC15, 190mph at OC1)

You just need two rudders/wings, one on the front, one in the back, and some movement thrusters.
The rudders must be in working position (like a top rudder on a plane's tail).

Also, if your belly is flat, you need to add a keel, allows the bot to bend over while taking turns, thus reducing the "slow down" effect of turning.
piippiz
1 year ago
You edited the cool sled into this? :/
well, I guess it is faster and such..

Ratings 8.5 practical and 8.0 creative0
learno
1 year ago
You don't like this one?

D: whyyyy, is so much bettah
piippiz
1 year ago
I don't like to rekt nubs unless I'm playing as a cat or such xD

Ratings 8.5 practical and 8.0 creative0
learno
1 year ago
EDIT -

Thanks to urobo7's perspicacious-ness I forgot to mention this has what none of the older models had!
A power booster!

The description has thus been updated, and a screenshot where you can see the blasted bastard has been uploaded.
Comm986
1 year ago
Constantly getting better

Ratings 10.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
El3veN
1 year ago
ho god
A great bot, i have see you in a game, and wow, awesome bot

Ratings 10.0 practical and 10.0 creative0
learno
1 year ago
AND HERE IS YOUR DAILY MUSIC, YOU MUSIC-LOVERS!
Imminent orgasm
urobo7
1 year ago
nice song, I'm not rating yet, because it's quite weird to figure this thing out, put it on the crf for testing! anyway, secondary weapon core? t1 plates as health pools so the damage to the guns transfers to those instead, should be enough spare cpu to fit a module in this, it's already fast probably a cloak, blink for faster? XD

Ratings 9.5 practical and 10.0 creative0
learno
1 year ago
WOW, you totally remind me that I forgot to tell it DOES have a module!

A power booster!
I'll add a screenshot where you can see it right away!

Thanks brah!

Also, I don't do CRF. Go do one yourself just like that ebbit-dope :P
urobo7
1 year ago
alright alright learno, it's fine, it's just that with land-drones is always a lottery, tsss it doesn't go backwards, you insane?! xD

Ratings 9.5 practical and 10.0 creative0
learno
1 year ago
GOING BACKWARDS IS FOR THE WEAK

A TRUE WARRIOR NEVER TURNS BACK
urobo7
1 year ago
kek, a true warrior would have teslas to take it up close and personal to the enemy! pointing and laughin' to the shotgun cowardice!

Ratings 9.5 practical and 10.0 creative0

Constructive Points

Constructive points are what you get when other users mark your reviews (comment+ratings) as constructive.

When should you mark a review as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely mark it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do I want these points?

After receiving X amount of points you will get a chance of being promoted to "trusted reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Trusted reviewer?

As a trusted reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Trusted reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Constructive Voting

Hey, seems like you're about to place your first constructive vote. That's awesome! I just wanted to inform you a bit about it before you jump into voting though. You can vote on any comment accompanied with a rating as a "Constructive Review". This will give the reviewer a "Constructive Point".

When should I vote a comment as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely vote it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do one want these points?

After receiving about 100 total amount of votes the user will get a chance of being promoted to "Approved Reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Approved Reviewer?

As an approved reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Approved reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Ok, got it! I want to place my vote now.
  • 11 items
1 page