Creative Robot

Tactical Bomber NRV-5

Plasma Bomber added 1 month ago

Stats :

HP : 1 873 301
ENERGY : 13 266
WEAPONS : 4 epic plasma
MODULES : place for 3 modules max inside the bomber


Gameplay :

STRONG vs Air units, Small land units, SMG, Shotgun, Plasma

EVEN vs Tanky lands units, Proto, Missiles

WEAK vs Flak, Railgun (10 hits)

_________________________________________________


This is the second version of NRV Bomber, after the Heavy Bomber NRV-4 (http://robocraftgarage.com/robot/bdABKPZ0) I wanted to make a tactical bomber with a similar design.

The strength of this design is that ALL the inside of the bomber is triforced, if you remove some materials you can carry maximum 3 modules.
You can play it emp / shield support plane, energy plasma damage dealer, etc. It give you more options.

The other big difference between NRV-4X and NRV-5 is the secondary weapons.
NRV-4 doesnt have seoncdary weapons, NRV-4X has a stinger, NRV-5 has flak, and flak is just the best for air / air combat.

You dont have lot of energy, but this is still enough to fire in infinite with flak, and you have enough power to burst with plasma. (you can OS pirana / small bot)
______________________________________________


Feel free to test it and give me feedbac In Game : LETH4LITY

Hope you'll like it

Favorites 0
Robot Statistics
Views
106
Comments
8
Ratings
3
Practical Rating
4.0
Creative Rating
7.0
Last Updated
Never
View Ratings

Robot Ratings

Function rating by McNugg27103.5
Function rating by andrefrcaetano4.5
Creative rating by andrefrcaetano7.0
Share this Robot
Direct link to this robot
Embed robot info on your website
Comments and Ratings
andrefrcaetano
1 month ago
The bot is a bit messy, and i dont think that 4 plasmas is enough.

Ratings 4.5 practical and 7.0 creative0
LETH4LITY
1 month ago
To cap attack speed with epic plasma you need 4 of them, one more is wasting energy flat
andrefrcaetano
1 month ago
4 is just the maximum fire rate, but i still think you should have more for redundancy

Ratings 4.5 practical and 7.0 creative0
LETH4LITY
1 month ago
Y but I dont think you need redundancy with this set up, I mean your plasma is only for small duration burst not for dps like a drone or smthg like that.

http://hpics.li/775f3d3
andrefrcaetano
1 month ago
If thats the case you should replace the Flak with SMGs .

Ratings 4.5 practical and 7.0 creative0
McNugg2710
1 month ago
Pretty bad, tbh sorry needs a lot of improvement

Ratings 3.5 practical0
LETH4LITY
1 month ago
You review isnt rly constructive, can you explain a bit more? Cuz the plane fly well, tank a lot flak & railgun, has enough energy to burst small units with plasma, can fire without stopping with flak, is full triforced, can carry 2-3 modules...

Which kind of improvement are you speaking about ?
McNugg2710
1 month ago
It needs to be rebuilt from the ground up to be good, sorry to say. I don't have the time to list all the improvements, just start again tbh.

Ratings 3.5 practical0

Constructive Points

Constructive points are what you get when other users mark your reviews (comment+ratings) as constructive.

When should you mark a review as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely mark it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do I want these points?

After receiving X amount of points you will get a chance of being promoted to "trusted reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Trusted reviewer?

As a trusted reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Trusted reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Constructive Voting

Hey, seems like you're about to place your first constructive vote. That's awesome! I just wanted to inform you a bit about it before you jump into voting though. You can vote on any comment accompanied with a rating as a "Constructive Review". This will give the reviewer a "Constructive Point".

When should I vote a comment as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely vote it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do one want these points?

After receiving about 100 total amount of votes the user will get a chance of being promoted to "Approved Reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Approved Reviewer?

As an approved reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Approved reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Ok, got it! I want to place my vote now.
  • 2 items
1 page