Practical Robot

GrappleJet S6|M11

Interceptor added 1 year ago
by sabbat
Brown Apprentice

S6 - Series 6
M11 - Model 11

Hi! My name`s sabbat, i mathematician and my english is bad ^^
but i have many experience with triforcing. Important to know, thats a true triforcing is not just 'not connect'! It`s requires mathematical calculation for every segment. If this calculation wrong - you armor will not work. If its right - you armor will be "successively break down" and your craft will keep optimal traction/firepower.
I have no purpose to convince someone - I'm talking about facts.

So, this craft use a segment full triforce armor, and it`s a thruster stick. In this project i use many own technologies (segment triforce, double framework, segment HP calculation, thrust balancing, weight balancing end etc.), and this craft is the result of realy hard work.

I build GrappleJet for a 37 days (3+ hours every day), and he have an 11 version`s (model`s) before M11. (Perfectionism, you know)
You can use it with smg, or plasma, or with nanotech - its does not matter, all weapon pylon is provided in double triforce framework.

GrappleJet have:
1) 759 cpu of _effective_ armor.
2) Excellent performance maneuverability.
3) The best balance between traction, armor and firepower.
4) An inner frame - with thurster`s (see proof).

GrappleJet have not:
1) Ease of piloting
2) ???

Сorrectly using, GrappleJet can resist any flying craft - even tesseract`s. And in correct platoon this craft can resist aeroflak/missle launcher/all enemy team.

Lets move on to proof`s:
1) 330+ sales in Roboshop (333 version without guns and 23 with guns)
2) Saving traction and guns after damage
https://youtu.be/HIQyUtdykDs?t=17s
https://youtu.be/HIQyUtdykDs?t=1m10s
3) 24% controllability
https://youtu.be/HIQyUtdykDs?t=1m43s
4) 2% (!!!) controllability
https://youtu.be/HIQyUtdykDs?t=2m35s
5) Inner frame
https://youtu.be/HQoVv49cP1g?t=24m7s
6) Full DPS on 67%
https://youtu.be/HQoVv49cP1g?t=34m7s

And my triforce proof (OLD robocraft):
1) Vector hovertank / T5 cube`s VS t10 Rail
https://youtu.be/AOU8-FfILwo?t=10m11s
2) Berserk assault hover capsule
https://youtu.be/sMKftC5qyXU?t=20m55s

My technological proof
1) Mantis
https://youtu.be/yOsZlFw5X6Q
2) Sword
https://youtu.be/EQEpKLHVdlo
3) Many guides
https://youtu.be/sMKftC5qyXU
https://youtu.be/jIui9_w7CII

I spend a lot of effort on robocraft recently - and I would like to do it usefully, сonsidering the recent FreeJam's nerf-patches. So, I offer individual crafting (tips and drawings, any concept - your or mine, for me it doesn't matter).
I can't take more than 1-2 orders per month, and if you don`t mind the price - you can mail me on [[ sabbat8310@yahoo.com ]]
It`s NOT cheap, so please don`t bother me without reason.

Favorites 2
Robot Statistics
Views
577
Comments
11
Ratings
12
Practical Rating
9.3
Creative Rating
7.3
Last Updated
Never
View Ratings

Robot Ratings

Function rating by Zelborg6.0
Creative rating by Zelborg2.0
Function rating by Otheisis10.0
Creative rating by Otheisis9.5
Function rating by El3veN9.5
Creative rating by El3veN9.5
Function rating by Soundwave_Wizard9.5
Creative rating by Soundwave_Wizard6.0
Function rating by bAd_CoOKiE10.0
Function rating by Comm9868.5
Creative rating by Comm9863.5
Function rating by Micsso9.0
Share this Robot
Direct link to this robot
Embed robot info on your website
Comments and Ratings
Micsso
1 year ago
Какие люди!

Ratings 9.0 practical0
sabbat
1 year ago
Привет-привет)
bAd_CoOKiE
1 year ago
This bot is indeed very good! But some things are strange.
The front part with the pitch thrusters is lost easily. I've built bots that can steer with 1% of health in all directions.
Why are the two rods at the front only connected to one end?
Weapons aren't protected enough. One volley of plasma can take of 2 or more of them.
BUT... it's very good! stable at 60% with full dps.
Nice job!

Ratings 10.0 practical0
Soundwave_Wizard
1 year ago
Lomls!

Ratings 9.5 practical and 6.0 creative0
El3veN
1 year ago
Nice, i like the design. he seems tanky, good job

Ratings 9.5 practical and 9.5 creative0
Otheisis
1 year ago
Seems well !

Ratings 10.0 practical and 9.5 creative0
Zelborg
1 year ago
... These do not belong here. Thruster sticks.. just gross.

Ratings 6.0 practical and 2.0 creative0
bAd_CoOKiE
1 year ago
You don't belong here. Stay with your artbots and don't comment on practical builds.

Ratings 10.0 practical0
Comm986
1 year ago
being practical at the cost of looks isn't worth it, Just saying. besides Zelborg's bots seem to be more about gaining a mix of practicality and style something a t-stick like this never achieve. people in rc seem to only care about practicality tbh

my score for creativity
originality 0.5
shaping 0
complexity 3

Ratings 8.5 practical and 3.5 creative0
bAd_CoOKiE
1 year ago
PRACTICAL RATING: Firepower, survivability and agility
This bot here deserves a 10/10 in each of these...
I don't even want to talk about creativity because it's obvious that boxes/tsticks deserve a 0 in this category.


Ratings 10.0 practical0
TristamK
1 year ago
If you can't buid craft like this, so why it can't be belong here? -_-

Constructive Points

Constructive points are what you get when other users mark your reviews (comment+ratings) as constructive.

When should you mark a review as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely mark it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do I want these points?

After receiving X amount of points you will get a chance of being promoted to "trusted reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Trusted reviewer?

As a trusted reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Trusted reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Constructive Voting

Hey, seems like you're about to place your first constructive vote. That's awesome! I just wanted to inform you a bit about it before you jump into voting though. You can vote on any comment accompanied with a rating as a "Constructive Review". This will give the reviewer a "Constructive Point".

When should I vote a comment as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely vote it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do one want these points?

After receiving about 100 total amount of votes the user will get a chance of being promoted to "Approved Reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Approved Reviewer?

As an approved reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Approved reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Ok, got it! I want to place my vote now.
  • 6 items
1 page