Practical Robot

Meteora

SMG Hover added 3 years ago

The results of my attempt to create a good hover with tx smg.
It relies on facing the enemy as it has good front shielding and armor and 4 side mounted guns. It's fast, maneuverable and I haven't experienced much difficulties 1v1-ing smg tank gunbeds. It can tank more rail hits than you'd suspect as it utilizes a lot of triforce (dual core covered by external layer of armor with 4 front guns connected to the core). Though still not very good at fighting aircraft.

note: the side mounted t10 smgs are actually not blocked by the shield regardless of the angle

* 468 cubes total
* 6x T10 + 2x TX SMGs (no gc for C6 T10 SMGs :[ )
* 4x T10 + 2x T8 hoverblades //2x t8 for extra redundancy rather than lift
* 4x thrusters //for extra speed and turn rate
* 1x T4 stabilizing rudder
* 3x front EP

Pros:
+ fast and agile
+ good damage/durability balance
+ good at 1v1 combat
+ hard to cripple

Cons:
- weak rear
- TX guns easily destroyed by plasma
- need to face the enemy
- somewhat flippable
- no extra equipment (radar/jammer)

Favorites 0
Robot Statistics
Views
494
Comments
1
Ratings
5
Practical Rating
8.5
Creative Rating
8.0
Last Updated
3 years ago
View Ratings

Robot Ratings

Function rating by panda180710.0
Function rating by Ratbag468.0
Creative rating by Ratbag468.0
Function rating by VladimirEterna8.5
Creative rating by VladimirEterna8.0
Share this Robot
Direct link to this robot
Embed robot info on your website
Comments and Ratings
VladimirEterna
2 years ago
nice build bro :)

Ratings 8.5 practical and 8.0 creative0

Constructive Points

Constructive points are what you get when other users mark your reviews (comment+ratings) as constructive.

When should you mark a review as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely mark it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do I want these points?

After receiving X amount of points you will get a chance of being promoted to "trusted reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Trusted reviewer?

As a trusted reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Trusted reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Constructive Voting

Hey, seems like you're about to place your first constructive vote. That's awesome! I just wanted to inform you a bit about it before you jump into voting though. You can vote on any comment accompanied with a rating as a "Constructive Review". This will give the reviewer a "Constructive Point".

When should I vote a comment as constructive though?

If you answer yes to at least three of these questions you should definitely vote it as constructive; is the review..

  1. friendly?
  2. helpful?
  3. encouraging?
  4. well structured?
  5. fair relative to the CPU used?

Why do one want these points?

After receiving about 100 total amount of votes the user will get a chance of being promoted to "Approved Reviewer". This promotion is done by a moderator if (s)he thinks your comment and rating behaviour is reasonable.

Approved Reviewer?

As an approved reviewer you no longer need to write a comment when rating a robot. If you add a comment you will receive extra points. Approved reviewer is not necessarily permanent, continous bad behaviour or lack of comments might get you demoted.

Ok, got it! I want to place my vote now.
  • 1 items
1 page