piippiz

Yellow Apprentice
User Info
In-Game Name
Points
15 353.0
Leaderboard
Profile Views
5 730
Joined
2 years ago
Activity
1 month ago
User Stats
Robots Added
47
Robot Ratings
9302
Robot Comments
4035
Tutorials Added
3
Tutorial Comments
67
Tutorial Ratings
97
Favorite Amount 50
Socialize
Biography

My Artbots were highly combat effective when I built them, but they didn't stand the trial of time.

ฅ(◑ﻌ◐ ) meow meow




Since the other way ">" cuts any message in half due to a weird bug on this site, here's alternate symbols that don't cut your messages: ><

Tutorials by piippiz

How to make circles & round objects ball, round, curve, your mom

Circles are not easy to make for everyone. Here are some tips.                                 ..

Avg. Rating 10.0
Read
The Artbot guide (thumbnail pic unrelated) art, eyes, well.., things

This guide is for YOU. (everyone out there, even R0SEFALL and Defilingsoul.) Have you ever had to sacrifice looks ..

Avg. Rating 9.8
Read
[OUTDATED GUIDE] How to disassemble a robot quickly? disassemble, fast, garage, empty

A quick tutorial on how to empty a garage fast, without selling or losing any parts.

Avg. Rating 10.0
Read

Profile Messages

m3ndz4
1 year ago
Thanks for all the advice! It's very helpful and am glad to see the site has dudes who are helpful towards the community especially new crafters.
pofacil
1 year ago
jolie ton chat guerrière
piippiz
1 year ago
I have almost 2 years of experience, and I build my Artbots to be as strong as possible. xD
pofacil
1 year ago
gg pour ton artbot pirate
pofacil
1 year ago
bonjour je te remercie d'avoir pris le temps de noter et commenter mes bot je sais qu'il y a pas les queue manque de block je joue plasma et je sais que les lasers sont mieux mais mon style de jeux plasma heal je joue a robocraft depuis le debut popo dragopo et bob sont mes conception merci a toi et bon jeu a toi
piippiz
1 year ago
No problem mate.
Manicminer6
1 year ago
Your cars are weak, but everything else is nice ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
piippiz
1 year ago
they are not for TDM, but otherwise they work decently. They're no frontline builds either, but when played right they're good support and do win 1v1 fights.
Vespertine32
1 year ago
Dude, i love your Digimon art works. They are amazing. Good old days.
piippiz
1 year ago
I have kept them viable even after the weapon update, (except for Submarimon :C)
Feel free to try them out, they're mostly made out of cubes and aero-rods, so the inventory forge should not be anywhere near expensive, if not completely free.

Last week I had an Elimination match end up in time running out, because the enemies couldn't rekt me and what was left of the team. Legendary about that match was, that I rekt Grigerbest in the same match, while I was at it xD
MetalGreymon too strongk.
Vespertine32
1 year ago
Yes i have been using metalgreymon and greymon. Do you think you can make a guilmon? its my fav digimon of all.
piippiz
1 year ago
it would be roughly the same size as greymon, so I'm thinking of making Growlmon right off the bat. Unless you have an idea how I can make just half of the body, like Guilmon sitting in a box. that way I could build a big head without the proportion being too much of an issue.
Vespertine32
1 year ago
Nope, no idea, unless you use nothing but blocks to form its sitting legs. it will be useless in game but would make a good art bot
ilies45
1 year ago
Hey Piip, are you a fan of classic muscle cars? I have done a "General Lee" replica and would like to hear what you think
Nysion
1 year ago
Have to admit, I'm really loving your builds. They're unique to RC and the likeness is uncanny.
juekaku
2 years ago
Just for the cat I give a thumb up ( °-°)b
Roboengineer001
2 years ago
Thank you. I really like your Bots!
piippiz
2 years ago
There's more to come! Favourite an user to get notified every time when they publish a new robot.
mistah_Jay
2 years ago
GL HF in the army m8

Don't get shot cuz u ain't gonna respawn!
piippiz
2 years ago
back safe and sound.
kinglagalot
2 years ago
Both of your podracers look very nice! good job.
piippiz
2 years ago
Thanks!
Lihamylly
2 years ago
övö hoothoot

Saako täs laitettua kaveriksi?
piippiz
2 years ago
Nyt voi kun klikkaa tota favourite, mut seki on vaa tyylii "follow".
MorteSilenziosa
2 years ago
Since yesterday you can talk in the game (in Robocraft obviously).
rocket81998
2 years ago
Have already build one, but not original landship. Those opinions are not negative, they are feedback, however. I will be the first one to prove that EPs were born for a reason and a small bot can kill many in the next meta
rocket81998
2 years ago
creating something new from given limited sources is invention (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention). I personally think that a build is not creative if it is like 80% similar to another bot or it is the replica of something in movie or so. The replicas should be called artbot, not receiving high rate on creativity but artistic.
piippiz
2 years ago
Creativity rating: looks, idea, originality and humor.

= an artbot is more original than any plated robot will ever be. Every player has spun some plates and tried them on, but not everyone has built whatever they want to. I could build the scream painting, or snoop dogg, and be the first one to do that in robocraft. If it looks good, is a funny idea, and is the first, it's bound to get higher rating than a space chunk of premade parts.

We all however have our own opinions. I've come across all kinds of negative feedback, and none of that is gonna change my mind, nor I did change theirs :D

So study the new cube properties, prepare for more landships and have a good day.
rocket81998
2 years ago
if I dont show my build off somewhere, there is no measure to that "originality". Yes Im on the forum frequently and I keep trying newbuild, but the "originality" isnt something that changes through time, or something that people can not copy and say it is theirs. So, you understand what I mean right?
piippiz
2 years ago
Yes. I just think that electroplates make builds less creative, and the same obvious shape that even the devs might have foresaw/intended.
rocket81998
2 years ago
I am talking about the 3 on creative rating. If you are talking about weak or strong, that is function rating. Please stay focus on what we are saying here. YOU gave me a big 3 for my light guard, andyou have not shown me why. All you have been talking about is functionality. and I consider this "A box would behave better than 3 cubes thick plated minimum functionality build" as verbal attack on my effort and creation, so please mind your language sir
piippiz
2 years ago
If you wanna be creative, make something that the parts remind you of.

I used a wing as a sword's blade. That's what it looked like, to me.

If you wanna build highly functional, keep your knowledge up to the date, by reading official forum entries about the effect of updates, and most importantly, try it yourself.
piippiz
2 years ago
Companion cube sure is a lot cooler box, than a load of basic mindless shields the game gives you. Even the idea is bad :/

I would never enter a battle without adding my touch into my robots.

Uploading a robot before having at least 500hours playtime, is just a waste, unless you seek advice. Even if you wanted advice, this is the wrong place for it. A seprate thread in the Robot engineering on the official forums, would attract more attention & higher quality answers, without numbers troubling your mind.

in balancing purposes i used to give 1's, but that gives the creator no points. I gave you 3, because i don't like the looks, and overall originality is very low, but I support you.

It is not a three, it's seven or something still. However, I think it's better now.

If I gave you the seven, it might have changed by a 0.1, maybe.

There's a low chance people visit a build at the last 50 pages of all of the ~260 pages full of builds, so I had to be a little harsh with my rating, just because this is no longer as effective as it once was.

And yes, it is no longer as original as it might used to be.
You might have given people a good idea, but it's kinda no longer yours.
rocket81998
2 years ago
"something similar" seems so vague.
How do you define untrue? I have no problem if the rating is like 6.5 if there is an explaination, but 3 is for a box, not a bot. You dont have the right to balance things, the Ads do. Im not tired of low rating, Im tired of people giving me low rate without an explaination or considering themselves so high they can judge balance and so on
piippiz
2 years ago
every build functions 10/10 if they're all considered as their own unique type working just the way they do.

But that's untrue, some builds are weaker than others.

Skill and playstyle is the only thing that makes a certain build effective. Some builds are effective regardless of the user, thus being more functional.
piippiz
2 years ago
A box would behave better than 3 cubes thick plated minimum functionality build.
rocket81998
2 years ago
When you low rate someone. please at least tell them the reason why ok?
My bot was made long ago, and if you saw "something" similar, check the date please.
piippiz
2 years ago
Something similiar has probably already existed for half a year, before RobocraftGarage was made. I'm mostly bringing down the untrue function ratings of old robots, based on how they would function now.

Ratings aside, success depends 90% from the person piloting said build.

There's no way the ratings could be 100% accurate on a site like this, but I'm trying. Giving them a push to more realistic direction.

Most of the times there's already a comment on the worst flaw in the design, or the rating just speaks for itself.



Old builds, balance.
new builds, advice.

I don't think anyone anymore, has the builds from the beginning of the list, so I just don't bother. I'll just balance the rating. The oldest builds don't get as many views as they already have, and that's why I have to rate it so low.

I have nothing against any of you builders and pilots, I'm just tired of old 10/10 rated artbots acting like 6.5/10 nowadays.
2 pages, goto: